The choice is obvious! Also, the book is cheap AND a sure thing. Case closed.
Submitted by: Unknown
Via: www.flickr.com
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Perhaps Then You’ll Solve This Repugnant Mystery! | This Day in History: The Trial of Emile Zola Next »
Book vs. Broad: A Comparison Chart
» See all 11 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Ye Peanutte Gallerie
plasticfroggy on Gee… Thanks God Epi on Gee… Thanks God eddi on Gee… Thanks God Tank668 on Gee… Thanks God barzuk on Liar! Liar!
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
Well, yeah.
ONLY $45? In 2012 terms, or 1960?
French-kissing a book gives me papercuts on my tongue.
and to be honest..this particular ‘beautiful woman’ doesn’t do a thing for me….
You’re probably not from the era in which it this was published. They had different beauty standards back then. She would have been a real hottie of the day.
I’d amend that “miserability” factor; I’ve struggled through some pretty misery-inducing books.
Well, if you can’t have any nookie and instead have to spend your nights with pulp novels, you also have to talk yourself into liking it… somehow.
Overcoatabilty is a great word.
Don’t know if 60000 words vs. 11 is good or bad
I wish books were only 25 cents!
Yeah, but can a book make a sammich?