Submitted by: Unknown
Via: www.psycho-facts.net
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous LIKE A BOSS | Peeps, Inc. Next »
The Internet Always Takes Things Too Far
» See all 16 comments
Leave a Reply
-
Ye Peanutte Gallerie
Epi on Gee… Thanks God eddi on Gee… Thanks God Tank668 on Gee… Thanks God barzuk on Liar! Liar! barzuk on WALMART? WTF is That?…
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
THE SCALES ON THAT TREX, FFFF.
*FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP*
When? When men stopped being f’in’ Blind!!!
hmmm… Dat Iguanodon?
When Men stopped worshipping “earth mother” goddesses.
those are some sexy dinosaurs fap fap fap lolz…i think the world would be less of a hellhole if men went back to worshipping earth mother goddesses
What, you mean if a woman had to be obese to be “beautiful”, people would be happier?
Let me think about that… NO.
that was only true when food was hard to find and fat= fertile and “rich”(as in has food)
“beauty” standards have always changed and will continue to change.
hopefully.
Anorexics: 0
Corn-fed gals: 4
Corn-fed gals are winning.
when they invented makeup, hair dye and spray, corsets, waxing and photography.
Makeup and hair dye…yeah, ancient Egyptians had them.
but they didn’t have corsets.
In facts they most often went barebreasted, if not naked at all…
oh, well, who needs corsets, anyway?
if Keira ate my cuisine for a couple weeks, she’d be winning that contest, hands down.
Something seems to be wrong. I don’t think I’m seeing all the images.
Anyway, there is a lot of territory between obese and anorexic and that’s where you’ll find beauty. IF you do not allow yourself to be influenced by what the fashion industry wants you to think is beautiful.
um actually ancient egyptians did wear corsets…. they were metal scale similar to chainmail…. they wore them around there waists not bust(like underbust corsets…)… considering it was mostly men who were concerned with their figure and it doubled as armor(corsets were used as body shapers for making soldiers a more universal size up into the 1700′s… non custom suits of armor are cheaper….) they didn’t wear anything over the boobs because back then womens chests were not considered sexual and large boobs were considered disgusting in many cultures, being flat allowed maneuverability and meant you were rich enough that you could afford a nursemaid to ruin her breast to feed your child instead.
Well, those renaissance portraits were not beauty models, they were just commissioned portraits. A part from the second one, that’s Giulia Farnese, she was considered a real beauty in her time. I suppose they should have put something like this http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/it/a/ae/Nascita_di_Venere_(Botticelli)_480.jpg (I never liked her, but that’s the beauty model of the thime), or this http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-tWNj8yZGQlw/Tc7bSV8rvMI/AAAAAAAAE_g/N9zzT9-Hcfk/s1600/botticelli_threegraces.jpg . Also this, it’s not an idealized beauty, but that’s the painter’s lover, so I suppose at least he found her beautiful: http://www.clubausonia.it/archivio%20storico/I%20grandi%20Artisti/filippo%20lippi/fs_Fra_Filippo_Lippi_Madonna.jpg . Going still back in time there is this, that was nicknamed the “Venus with beautiful butt cheeks”, Venus Callipyge, so, you know, it must correspond to the ellenistic idea of a beautiful female body (that, by the way, is pretty much my same idea, not skinny, not extremely fat, not overtonic, just right) http://www.bta.it/img/a1/15/bta01550.jpg